The Doctrine of Christian Discovery: Revisiting Johnson v. M'Intosh at 200

This recommendation is shared by Bill Tammeus.

Credit: Mitch Randall

In the Good Faith Media article "The Doctrine of Christian Discovery: Johnson v. M'Intosh at 200," the author examines the lasting implications of the landmark 1823 Supreme Court case, Johnson v. M'Intosh, which established the legal foundation for the Doctrine of Christian Discovery. The article marks the 200th anniversary of this case, offering a critical reflection on how it shaped the dispossession of Indigenous lands and how its legacy continues to affect Native American rights today.

Summary of the Article

The Good Faith Media article explores the historical and ongoing impact of the 1823 Supreme Court case Johnson v. M'Intosh, which legitimized the Doctrine of Christian Discovery. This doctrine, rooted in European colonialism, declared that Christian European nations had the right to claim sovereignty over lands occupied by non-Christian peoples. In this case, the Court ruled that Native American tribes did not have full legal title to their land, as their land could only be sold to European settlers or the U.S. government.

The article details the significance of this legal doctrine, which became a cornerstone of American law regarding Indigenous land rights. By framing Indigenous land as terra nullius (empty land) until "discovered" by Christian Europeans, the doctrine disregarded the existence of Indigenous nations and cultures, providing legal justification for the widespread seizure of their lands. The Johnson v. M'Intosh decision, along with the Doctrine of Christian Discovery, played a crucial role in the legal, social, and economic marginalization of Native American peoples.

Reflecting on the 200th anniversary of the case, the article emphasizes the continued relevance of this doctrine in modern legal disputes over Native American land rights. The article also highlights how the principles of Johnson v. M'Intosh have persisted in contemporary legal frameworks, influencing cases related to land, sovereignty, and tribal authority. By critiquing the doctrine, the article urges readers to reconsider the historical and theological underpinnings of this legal framework and its continuing impact on Native American communities.

The article calls for a reexamination of the Doctrine of Christian Discovery in light of modern-day conversations about justice, restitution, and reconciliation. It stresses the need for legal reform and recognition of Indigenous sovereignty in order to address the lingering effects of this doctrine and its role in the history of colonialism.

Why This Matters

The Doctrine of Christian Discovery, formalized in Johnson v. M'Intosh, has had lasting effects on the legal and cultural landscape of the United States. By giving legal authority to European powers to dispossess Indigenous peoples of their land, it entrenched the idea that Indigenous sovereignty could be overridden by settler colonialism. Understanding the historical roots of this doctrine is crucial for comprehending the legal challenges that Native American communities still face today.

The article highlights the need for a broader societal reckoning with the legacy of colonialism and its ongoing impact on Indigenous peoples. It emphasizes that the legal framework established by Johnson v. M'Intosh continues to affect Native American communities' ability to govern themselves and maintain control over their lands. The call for reexamination and reform is urgent, as it challenges the foundation of centuries of legal and cultural subjugation.

Moreover, the article draws attention to the intersection of religion, colonialism, and law, urging readers to critically engage with the theological justifications that underpinned the Doctrine of Christian Discovery. The article encourages a reckoning with the ways in which Christian doctrine has been used historically to justify the oppression and exploitation of Indigenous peoples.

The Good Faith Media article serves as a reminder that decolonization is not only about reclaiming land but also about challenging the legal and theological systems that have perpetuated injustice for centuries.

Reflection on the Original Author

The Good Faith Media article provides a thought-provoking and critical examination of the Doctrine of Christian Discovery and its roots in the Johnson v. M'Intosh case. The author offers a balanced and insightful reflection on the lasting legacy of this doctrine, tracing its implications for contemporary Native American land disputes. The article successfully connects the historical impact of the case to ongoing conversations about racial justice, land rights, and reconciliation.

The author also does a commendable job of making the legal and historical complexities of the case accessible to a broader audience, offering a clear explanation of how the doctrine continues to shape American law. By urging readers to reconsider the foundations of this legal framework, the article challenges prevailing narratives about Indigenous land rights and sovereignty, contributing to the broader conversation about justice and reparations.